Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων του «The foundation for an open source city by Jason Hibbets»

Από wiki.pirateparty.gr
Μετάβαση στην πλοήγηση Πήδηση στην αναζήτηση
Γραμμή 182: Γραμμή 182:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
<big><big>Foreword</big></big>
<big><big>Introduction</big></big>
Over the last two years, I found an interesting way to blend my passions for open source, my local Raleigh community, and civic participation. It comes in the form of open government. Along the way, I’ve found a great group of civic-minded geeks who share a similar passion and have stepped up to advocate for a more open government. My mission: to create a better citizen experience.
Every generation has its philosopher—a writer or an artist who captures the imagination of a time. Sometimes these philosophers are recognized as such; often it takes generations before the connection is made real. But recognized or not, a time gets marked by the people who speak its ideals, whether in the whisper of a poem, or the blast of a political movement.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 193: Γραμμή 193:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Today, the citizen experience for many individuals includes, but is not limited to, voting, lobbying, and complaining about “government.” In the United States, the “government” includes citizens. For the people, by the people. But many of us let our busy lives and many times, politics, get in the way, distract us, or turn us off.
Our generation has a philosopher. He is not an artist, or a professional writer. He is a programmer. Richard Stallman began his work in the labs of MIT, as a programmer and architect building operating system software. He has built his career on a stage of public life, as a programmer and an architect founding a movement for freedom in a world increasingly defined by “code.”
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 201: Γραμμή 201:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Think about your own experiences with government. How have you been disappointed? What could be better? How could your interactions be enhanced?
“Code” is the technology that makes computers run. Whether inscribed in software or burned in hardware, it is the collection of instructions, first written in words, that directs the functionality of machines. These machines—computers—increasingly define and control our life. They determine how phones connect, and what runs on TV. They decide whether video can be streamed across a broadband link to a computer. They control what a computer reports back to its manufacturer. These machines run us. Code runs these machines.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 209: Γραμμή 209:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Our experience with government could be so much better. We have ideas on how to improve the communities we live in or fix a part of our government that isn’t working correctly or efficiently. But do we have the tools, knowledge, time, information, or access needed to make these improvements?
What control should we have over this code? What understanding? What freedom should there be to match the control it enables? What power?
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 217: Γραμμή 217:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Improving the citizen experience means that your interactions with government are more participatory and collaborative. And that starts with having a more transparent, open, and inviting government. This book will explore Raleigh’s path to what I call an “open source city” and how the open government movement in Raleigh has accelerated over the last two years with the passing of an open government resolution, two successful CityCamp Raleigh events, and the forming of a Code for America brigade.
These questions have been the challenge of Stallman’s life. Through his works and his words, he has pushed us to see the importance of keeping code “free.” Not free in the sense that code writers don’t get paid, but free in the sense that the control coders build be transparent to all, and that anyone have the right to take that control, and modify it as he or she sees fit. This is “free software”; “free software” is one answer to a world built in code.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 225: Γραμμή 225:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
First, I will define the elements of an open source city and demonstrate how Raleigh has applied those characteristics. We’ll explore the open source culture, government policies, events, and economic development. Then we’ll take a look at how open government is applied and some of the things I’ve learned through my travels.
“Free.” Stallman laments the ambiguity in his own term. There’s nothing to lament. Puzzles force people to think, and this term “free” does this puzzling work quite well. To modern American ears, “free software” sounds utopian, impossible. Nothing, not even lunch, is free. How could the most important words running the most critical machines running the world be “free.” How could a sane society aspire to such an ideal?
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 233: Γραμμή 233:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
This book draws on my open government experience and includes articles I’ve written and interviews conducted for opensource.com–an online publication and community exploring how the principles of the open source development model are applied to disciplines such as business, education, government, health, law, and life.
Yet the odd clink of the word “free” is a function of us, not of the term. “Free” has different senses, only one of which refers to “price.” A much more fundamental sense of “free” is the “free,” Stallman says, in the term “free speech,” or perhaps better in the term “free labor.” Not free as in costless, but free as in limited in its control by others. Free software is control that is transparent, and open to change, just as free laws, or the laws of a “free society,” are free when they make their control knowable, and open to change. The aim of Stallman’s “free software movement” is to make as much code as it can transparent, and subject to change, by rendering it “free.”
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 241: Γραμμή 241:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
I’ve been employed by Red Hat since 2003, gaining ten years of open source experience. I’ve worked on opensource.com, described as a community service by Red Hat, since the project launched in January 2010. I have many roles at opensource.com including project manager, content curator, community manager, contributor, and lead administrator.
The mechanism of this rendering is an extraordinarily clever device called “copyleft” implemented through a license called GPL. Using the power of copyright law, “free software” not only assures that it remains open, and subject to change, but that other software that takes and uses “free software” (and that technically counts as a “derivative”) must also itself be free. If you use and adapt a free software program, and then release that adapted version to the public, the released version must be as free as the version it was adapted from. It must, or the law of copyright will be violated.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 249: Γραμμή 249:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Opensource.com aspires to publish all of their content under Creative Commons, and there are a number of articles and interviews originally published there that I've incorporated into this book. This book itself would not be possible without Creative Commons–a set of licenses that grant copyright permissions for creative works like this.
“Free software,” like free societies, has its enemies. Microsoft has waged a war against the GPL, warning whoever will listen that the GPL is a “dangerous” license. The dangers it names, however, are largely illusory. Others object to the “coercion” in GPL’s insistence that modified versions are also free. But a condition is not coercion. If it is not coercion for Microsoft to refuse to permit users to distribute modified versions of its product Office without paying it (presumably) millions, then it is not coercion when the GPL insists that modified versions of free software be free too.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 257: Γραμμή 257:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
The purpose of this book is to tell Raleigh’s open source story and inspire others not only to participate, but to run with their ideas and improve our government. I want this story to be a catalyst for more open government, open data, and citizen participation, in Raleigh and beyond.
And then there are those who call Stallman’s message too extreme. But extreme it is not. Indeed, in an obvious sense, Stallman’s work is a simple translation of the freedoms that our tradition crafted in the world before code. “Free software” would assure that the world governed by code is as “free” as our tradition that built the world before code.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 265: Γραμμή 265:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
About the author
For example: A “free society” is regulated by law. But there are limits that any free society places on this regulation through law: No society that kept its laws secret could ever be called free. No government that hid its regulations from the regulated could ever stand in our tradition. Law controls. But it does so justly only when visibly. And law is visible only when its terms are knowable and controllable by those it regulates, or by the agents of those it regulates (lawyers, legislatures).
Jason Hibbets is a project manager in Corporate Marketing at Red Hat. He is the lead administrator, content curator, and community manager for opensource.com and has been with Red Hat since 2003.He graduated from North Carolina State University, and lives in Raleigh, North Carolina where he has been applying open source principles to neighborhood organizations in Raleigh for several years, highlighting the importance of transparency, collaboration, and community building. In his spare time, he enjoys surfing, gardening, watching football, participating in his local government, blogging on southwestraleigh.com, and training his Border Collies to be frisbee and agility dogs. He heads to the beaches of North Carolina during hurricane season to ride the waves. • Website: http://hibbets.net/• Twitter: @jhibbets • Email: jason@hibbets.net
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
Γραμμή 273: Γραμμή 274:
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
ReferencesI wanted to include a list of people and references covering the opengovernment and open data movements to help get you started on yourown mission.• David Eaves is a public policy entrepreneur, open governmentactivist, and negotiation expert advising government officials onopen government and open data - http://eaves.ca/• Luke Fretwell is the Co-founder of GovFresh, which featurespublic servant innovators, civic entrepreneurs and the ideas andtechnology changing the way government works -http://govfresh.com/• Alex Howard is the Government 2.0 Washington Correspondentfor O'Reilly Media and covers open innovation, open sourcesoftware, open data, and open government technology -http://radar.oreilly.com/alexh• Steve Ressler is the Founder and President of GovLoop, a socialnetwork connecting over 60,000 federal, state, and localgovernment innovators - http://www.govloop.com/• Center for Effective Government (formerly OMB Watch) -http://www.foreffectivegov.org/• CityCamp - http://citycamp.govfresh.com/• Code for America - http://codeforamerica.org/• Creative Commons - http://creativecommons.org/• Data.gov - http://www.data.gov/• E-Democracy.org - http://forums.e-democracy.org/• GovLoop - http://www.govloop.com/• Open Data Handbook - http://opendatahandbook.org/• Open Government - http://opengovernment.org/• Open Government Partnership -http://www.opengovpartnership.org/• Opensource.com - http://opensource.com/• Sunlight Foundation - http://sunlightfoundation.com/• The Open Knowledge Foundation - http://okfn.org/• The Open Source Initiative - http://opensource.org/• We the People - https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/
This condition on law extends beyond the work of a legislature. Think about the practice of law in American courts. Lawyers are hired by their clients to advance their clients’ interests. Sometimes that interest is advanced through litigation. In the course of this litigation, lawyers write briefs. These briefs in turn affect opinions written by judges. These opinions decide who wins a particular case, or whether a certain law can stand consistently with a constitution.
</td>
</td>
<td width="50%">
<td width="50%">
...
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
All the material in this process is free in the sense that Stallman means. Legal briefs are open and free for others to use. The arguments are transparent (which is different from saying they are good) and the reasoning can be taken without the permission of the original lawyers. The opinions they produce can be quoted in later briefs. They can be copied and integrated into another brief or opinion. The “source code” for American law is by design, and by principle, open and free for anyone to take. And take lawyers do—for it is a measure of a great brief that it achieves its creativity through the reuse of what happened before. The source is free; creativity and an economy is built upon it.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
This economy of free code (and here I mean free legal code) doesn’t starve lawyers. Law firms have enough incentive to produce great briefs even though the stuff they build can be taken and copied by anyone else. The lawyer is a craftsman; his or her product is public. Yet the crafting is not charity. Lawyers get paid; the public doesn’t demand such work without price. Instead this economy flourishes, with later work added to the earlier.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
We could imagine a legal practice that was different—briefs and arguments that were kept secret; rulings that announced a result but not the reasoning. Laws that were kept by the police but published to no one else. Regulation that operated without explaining its rule.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
We could imagine this society, but we could not imagine calling it “free.” Whether or not the incentives in such a society would be better or more efficiently allocated, such a society could not be known as free. The ideals of freedom, of life within a free society, demand more than efficient application. Instead, openness and transparency are the constraints within which a legal system gets built, not options to be added if convenient to the leaders. Life governed by software code should be no less.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
Code writing is not litigation. It is better, richer, more productive. But the law is an obvious instance of how creativity and incentives do not depend upon perfect control over the products created. Like jazz, or novels, or architecture, the law gets built upon the work that went before. This adding and changing is what creativity always is. And a free society is one that assures that its most important resources remain free in just this sense.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
This book collects the writing of Richard Stallman in a manner that will make its subtlety and power clear. The essays span a wide range, from copyright to the history of the free software movement. They include many arguments not well known, and among these, an especially insightful account of the changed circumstances that render copyright in the digital world suspect. They will serve as a resource for those who seek to understand the thought of this most powerful man—powerful in his ideas, his passion, and his integrity, even if powerless in every other way. They will inspire others who would take these ideas, and build upon them.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
I don’t know Stallman well. I know him well enough to know he is a hard man to like. He is driven, often impatient. His anger can flare at friend as easily as foe. He is uncompromising and persistent; patient in both.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
Yet when our world finally comes to understand the power and danger of code—when it finally sees that code, like laws, or like government, must be transparent to be free—then we will look back at this uncompromising and persistent programmer and recognize the vision he has fought to make real: the vision of a world where freedom and knowledge survives the compiler. And we will come to see that no man, through his deeds or words, has done as much to make possible the freedom that this next society could have.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
We have not earned that freedom yet. We may well fail in securing it. But whether we succeed or fail, in these essays is a picture of what that freedom could be. And in the life that produced these words and works, there is inspiration for anyone who would, like Stallman, fight to create this freedom.
Lawrence Lessig
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="50%">
Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This foreword was originally published, in 2002, as the introduction to the first edition. This version is part of Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman, 2nd ed. (Boston: GNU Press, 2010).
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire chapter are permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.
</td>
<td width="50%">
...
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td colspan="2">
[[Αρχείο:Free Software, Free Society - Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman book cover.jpg|600X432|κέντρο|Free Software, Free Society - Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman]]
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>

</font>
</font>

Αναθεώρηση της 18:36, 7 Νοεμβρίου 2014





The foundation for an open source city by Jason Hibbets

The foundation for an open source city

© Jason Hibbets 2013

ISBN: 978-1-300-92317-6

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons

First edition

Published by Lulu

3101 Hillsborough Street

Raleigh, NC 27607


This book uses Junction, a humanist sans-serif font and the first open source type project started by The League of Moveable Type.

...


For the open source, open government, and open data communities



...


Contents


Introduction


Chapter 1: Defining an open source city

What is open source?
The secret ingredient in open source
What is open government?
What is open data?
The beginning of my citizen involvement
What makes a city open source?
The elements of an open source city


Chapter 2: Citizen participation and culture

Part 1: CityCamp–The beginning
A CityCamp was born
Organizing CityCamp Raleigh
Creating a citizen movement for open government
Changing the culture of government
Part 2: The culture of Raleigh
A wiki finds its tribe
SPARKcon: Organizing creative talent with open source
BarCamp: A technology-focused unconference
Walk Your City: Open source wayfinding
There’s something in the culture


Chapter 3: Open government and open data

How to get your city to pass an open government policy.
Raleigh’s open government resolution and roadmap.
An open source city takes shape: online tools and data
The impact of Open Raleigh
Open data: Meaningful, visual information
The influence and impact of SeeClickFix
An open platform for the future


Chapter 4: Supporting user groups, conferences, and events

Four ways Raleigh supports user groups
A signature, open source technology conference
Hosting a FOSS fair the open source way
Maker Faire and the DIY movement
A playbook for user groups
A leader in open source


Chapter 5: A hub for innovation fueled by open source

How open source disrupts traditional economic development
Open source develops the future of downtown Raleigh
Connecting the dots: Open source, government, and economicdevelopment
Hosting an innovation summit
A year after the innovation summit
NC State feeds the innovative engine
Open source: A pillar of an innovative brand
A hub of open source companies


Chapter 6: The principles of being an open source city in action

Part 1: Code for America
Hacking on code and culture: Failure as validated learning
What does open government mean to you?
Send in the brigade
Race for reuse gives open source projects a second wind
Starting a Raleigh Code for America Brigade
Raleigh Brigade presents at city council
Race for Reuse results
Why engagement days matter
Part 2: CityCamp tour and best practices
CityCamp Colorado
CityCamp Honolulu
CityCamp Kansas City
CityCamp and unconference best practices
Part 3: Evolving CityCamp Raleigh
What government officials learned from doing it the open sourceway
Transitioning to the future


Chapter 7: The future for an open source city

Raleigh: A completely open global city
CityShape: A healthier community through open data
An urban farm with open source roots
The new RFP: Request for partnership
What’s next for Raleigh?


Acknowledgments

About the editors

About the author

References

...

Introduction


Over the last two years, I found an interesting way to blend my passions for open source, my local Raleigh community, and civic participation. It comes in the form of open government. Along the way, I’ve found a great group of civic-minded geeks who share a similar passion and have stepped up to advocate for a more open government. My mission: to create a better citizen experience.

...

Today, the citizen experience for many individuals includes, but is not limited to, voting, lobbying, and complaining about “government.” In the United States, the “government” includes citizens. For the people, by the people. But many of us let our busy lives and many times, politics, get in the way, distract us, or turn us off.

...

Think about your own experiences with government. How have you been disappointed? What could be better? How could your interactions be enhanced?

...

Our experience with government could be so much better. We have ideas on how to improve the communities we live in or fix a part of our government that isn’t working correctly or efficiently. But do we have the tools, knowledge, time, information, or access needed to make these improvements?

...

Improving the citizen experience means that your interactions with government are more participatory and collaborative. And that starts with having a more transparent, open, and inviting government. This book will explore Raleigh’s path to what I call an “open source city” and how the open government movement in Raleigh has accelerated over the last two years with the passing of an open government resolution, two successful CityCamp Raleigh events, and the forming of a Code for America brigade.

...

First, I will define the elements of an open source city and demonstrate how Raleigh has applied those characteristics. We’ll explore the open source culture, government policies, events, and economic development. Then we’ll take a look at how open government is applied and some of the things I’ve learned through my travels.

...

This book draws on my open government experience and includes articles I’ve written and interviews conducted for opensource.com–an online publication and community exploring how the principles of the open source development model are applied to disciplines such as business, education, government, health, law, and life.

...

I’ve been employed by Red Hat since 2003, gaining ten years of open source experience. I’ve worked on opensource.com, described as a community service by Red Hat, since the project launched in January 2010. I have many roles at opensource.com including project manager, content curator, community manager, contributor, and lead administrator.

...

Opensource.com aspires to publish all of their content under Creative Commons, and there are a number of articles and interviews originally published there that I've incorporated into this book. This book itself would not be possible without Creative Commons–a set of licenses that grant copyright permissions for creative works like this.

...

The purpose of this book is to tell Raleigh’s open source story and inspire others not only to participate, but to run with their ideas and improve our government. I want this story to be a catalyst for more open government, open data, and citizen participation, in Raleigh and beyond.

...

About the author

Jason Hibbets is a project manager in Corporate Marketing at Red Hat. He is the lead administrator, content curator, and community manager for opensource.com and has been with Red Hat since 2003.He graduated from North Carolina State University, and lives in Raleigh, North Carolina where he has been applying open source principles to neighborhood organizations in Raleigh for several years, highlighting the importance of transparency, collaboration, and community building. In his spare time, he enjoys surfing, gardening, watching football, participating in his local government, blogging on southwestraleigh.com, and training his Border Collies to be frisbee and agility dogs. He heads to the beaches of North Carolina during hurricane season to ride the waves. • Website: http://hibbets.net/• Twitter: @jhibbets • Email: jason@hibbets.net

...

ReferencesI wanted to include a list of people and references covering the opengovernment and open data movements to help get you started on yourown mission.• David Eaves is a public policy entrepreneur, open governmentactivist, and negotiation expert advising government officials onopen government and open data - http://eaves.ca/• Luke Fretwell is the Co-founder of GovFresh, which featurespublic servant innovators, civic entrepreneurs and the ideas andtechnology changing the way government works -http://govfresh.com/• Alex Howard is the Government 2.0 Washington Correspondentfor O'Reilly Media and covers open innovation, open sourcesoftware, open data, and open government technology -http://radar.oreilly.com/alexh• Steve Ressler is the Founder and President of GovLoop, a socialnetwork connecting over 60,000 federal, state, and localgovernment innovators - http://www.govloop.com/• Center for Effective Government (formerly OMB Watch) -http://www.foreffectivegov.org/• CityCamp - http://citycamp.govfresh.com/• Code for America - http://codeforamerica.org/• Creative Commons - http://creativecommons.org/• Data.gov - http://www.data.gov/• E-Democracy.org - http://forums.e-democracy.org/• GovLoop - http://www.govloop.com/• Open Data Handbook - http://opendatahandbook.org/• Open Government - http://opengovernment.org/• Open Government Partnership -http://www.opengovpartnership.org/• Opensource.com - http://opensource.com/• Sunlight Foundation - http://sunlightfoundation.com/• The Open Knowledge Foundation - http://okfn.org/• The Open Source Initiative - http://opensource.org/• We the People - https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/

...